<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Roger Halbheer on Security &#187; Incidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/category/microsoft/incidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security</link>
	<description>Information Security Discussion by Microsoft&#039;s Worldwide Chief Security Advisor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Microsoft can teach Apple about security response</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/05/09/what-microsoft-can-teach-apple-about-security-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/05/09/what-microsoft-can-teach-apple-about-security-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patch Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/?p=2668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess, I do not have to comment this – right?</p> <p>What Microsoft can teach Apple about security response</p> <p>To quote the summary: </p> <p>Microsoft just released seven security updates to fix 23 vulnerabilities in Windows and other products. In February, Apple released a massive update that covered 51 vulnerabilities and also introduced an embarrassing <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/05/09/what-microsoft-can-teach-apple-about-security-response/">What Microsoft can teach Apple about security response</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess, I do not have to comment this – right?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/what-microsoft-can-teach-apple-about-security-response/4987?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zdnet%2FBott+%28ZDNet+Ed+Bott%27s+Microsoft+Report%29" target="_blank">What Microsoft can teach Apple about security response</a></p>
<p>To quote the summary: </p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft just released seven security updates to fix 23 vulnerabilities in Windows and other products. In February, Apple released a massive update that covered 51 vulnerabilities and also introduced an embarrassing security flaw. The contrast is striking.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/05/09/what-microsoft-can-teach-apple-about-security-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep all your software updated and current</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/04/13/keep-all-your-software-updated-and-current/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/04/13/keep-all-your-software-updated-and-current/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incident Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patch Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/?p=2644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know that I keep going and going on that. When I talk to customers and mainly to providers of the critical infrastructure about security, one of the key things to me is to keep the software updated. It is about patching and it is about staying on the latest version of your software. To <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/04/13/keep-all-your-software-updated-and-current/">Keep all your software updated and current</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that I keep going and going on that. When I talk to customers and mainly to providers of the critical infrastructure about security, one of the key things to me is to keep the software updated. It is about patching and it is about staying on the latest version of your software. To me, today Windows XP is a huge risk out there. It was an outstanding operating system when it was launched but it is definitely outdated if you think about how the threat landscape looked like only 5-10 years ago. I am aware of the fact that not all systems can be upgraded because of compatibility issues, a vendor might not even exist anymore. Then these systems need definitely be shielded in different ways to keep them as far off the network as possible.</p>
<p>The reason for this post is, that I still see a lot of customers who developed a really good practice for handling Microsoft updates but not for the rest. I just read these two articles this morning:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb12-08.html" target="_blank">Security Updates Available for Adobe Reader and Acrobat</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.esecurityplanet.com/browser-security/google-patches-chrome-18-for-flash-flaws.html" target="_blank">Google Patches Chrome 18 for Flash Flaws</a> </li>
</ul>
<p>So, make sure you cover all your software including third-party apps and open source.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/04/13/keep-all-your-software-updated-and-current/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Updates and Exploit Code</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/03/19/security-updates-and-exploit-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/03/19/security-updates-and-exploit-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incident Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/?p=2636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION:So far there is &#8220;only&#8221; Proof of Concept code in the wild, no real exploit.</p> <p>In our last update cycle we published the security bulletin MS12-020 Vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Could Allow Remote Code Execution. Relatively soon after the release, there was a public exploit code available &#8211; we informed here: Proof-of-Concept Code available for <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/03/19/security-updates-and-exploit-code/">Security Updates and Exploit Code</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CORRECTION:</strong>So far there is &#8220;only&#8221; Proof of Concept code in the wild, no real exploit.</p>
<p>In our last update cycle we published the security bulletin <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-020" target="_blank">MS12-020 Vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Could Allow Remote Code Execution</a>. Relatively soon after the release, there was a public exploit code available &#8211; we informed here: <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2012/03/16/proof-of-concept-code-available-for-ms12-020.aspx" target="_blank">Proof-of-Concept Code available for MS12-020</a>.</p>
<p>This would not necessarily make me blog as it is a fairly common scenario – unfortunately. In all the different discussion lists internally, I realized that a there was a lot of confusion and nervousness internally and with our customers, which I definitely can understand. </p>
<p>I just wanted to make sure, that you understand and see all the resources you have available to take an informed decision. We basically give you two assessments: A <em>Severity Rating and Vulnerability Impact</em> and an <em>Exploitability Index</em>:</p>
<ul>
<li>The <em>Security Rating and Vulnerability Impact</em> describes how severe the vulnerability is and is described <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/rating" target="_blank">here in detail</a>. If there are default mitigations in place, there is a chance that a vulnerability rating is lower. What is important is, that our assessment is always based on a default, out-of-the-box installation. If you decide to switch off the firewall, obviously there is a good chance that your risk is higher than flagged in our assessment. </li>
<li>The <em>Exploitability Index</em> shows how likely we think an exploit is. We provide this information since late 2008 but it seems still not too well known – it is <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/cc998259.aspx" target="_blank">described here</a>. You always find it in the bulletin summary per month. </li>
</ul>
<p>Let’s apply this now to MS12-020 described above: The security rating is “critical”, which is the highest possible rating we have and the exploitability index is on “1 &#8211; Exploit code likely”. So, in this case we have a critical vulnerability and we expected a working exploit code to hit the net – unfortunately we have proven to be right.</p>
<p>This is in no means to criticize anybody, it is more to give you all the information to take the right decisions upfront. This update was definitely one you want to set extremely high on your priority list…</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2012/03/19/security-updates-and-exploit-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMET&#8211;Protection Against Zero-Days</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/10/23/emetprotection-against-zero-days/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/10/23/emetprotection-against-zero-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/10/23/emetprotection-against-zero-days/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit is definitely not new but I recently realized that not too many people know about it – and they should. EMET helps you to raise your shields against zero-days and any exploit in the wild. I do not say that it is a silver bullet but it is definitely going <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/10/23/emetprotection-against-zero-days/">EMET&#8211;Protection Against Zero-Days</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit  is definitely not new but I recently realized that not too many people know about it – and they should. EMET helps you to raise your shields against zero-days and any exploit in the wild. I do not say that it is a silver bullet but it is definitely going into this direction – a little bit.</p>
<p>You can find all the necessary information on EMET here:</p>
<ul>
<li>That’s the article on our support website: <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2458544" target="_blank">The Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit</a></li>
<li>Here a TechNet blog post: <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2011/05/18/new-version-of-emet-is-now-available.aspx" target="_blank">New version of EMET is now available</a></li>
<li>To <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=1677" target="_blank">download EMET v 2.1</a></li>
<li>And a <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/Video/ff859539" target="_blank">BlueHat session</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Before you start, please make sure that you have the Bitlocker recovery key ready (you are running Bitlocker, don’t you?) or that you suspend Bitlocker for the time of the configuration as EMET might change your Data Execution Prevention settings, which change your bootloader, which invalidates the Bitlocker signature, which needs to be proven.</p>
<p>I always love to strengthen my policies and see when something breaks and how. I started to use it and it actually provides you a fairly straight-forward interface with what is running and in which state:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="image" src="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image_thumb.png" alt="image" width="599" height="693" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>You can then configure your applications and define on which level you want them to be protected. It might then happen that this pops up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image1.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="image" src="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image_thumb1.png" alt="image" width="473" height="188" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>I wont tell you which application it was but I was a little bit scared…</p>
<p>Anyway, if you did not use it yet, I think you should!</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/10/23/emetprotection-against-zero-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Malware Protection Center on Facebook and Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/07/28/microsoft-malware-protection-center-on-facebook-and-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/07/28/microsoft-malware-protection-center-on-facebook-and-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incident Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incident Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/07/28/microsoft-malware-protection-center-on-facebook-and-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know, I have been fairly slow in blogging currently but I was fairly busy with a few cool projects (which I will disclose later) and – time flies if you are having fun</p> <p>Just a quick one:</p> <p>The MMPC on Facebook and Twitter</p> <p>The Microsoft Malware Protection Center (MMPC) officially launched its Facebook page <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/07/28/microsoft-malware-protection-center-on-facebook-and-twitter/">Microsoft Malware Protection Center on Facebook and Twitter</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I have been fairly slow in blogging currently but I was fairly busy with a few cool projects (which I will disclose later) and – time flies if you are having fun</p>
<p>Just a quick one:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9779064">The MMPC on Facebook and Twitter</a></p>
<p>The Microsoft Malware Protection Center (MMPC) officially launched its Facebook page and Twitter account. From this Welcome page, you can read the latest blog posts, see the latest Twitter feeds, and find out what threats most affect your desktop.</p></blockquote>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/07/28/microsoft-malware-protection-center-on-facebook-and-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Security Comparison: Microsoft Office vs. Oracle Openoffice</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/04/19/a-security-comparison-microsoft-office-vs-oracle-openoffice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/04/19/a-security-comparison-microsoft-office-vs-oracle-openoffice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/04/19/a-security-comparison-microsoft-office-vs-oracle-openoffice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there is not much to say about this. It is a blog post by CanegieMellon called A Security Comparison: Microsoft Office vs. Oracle Openoffice and just does what it says. However, I do not particularly like the security comparison of products built solely on vulnerabilities as this shows only one side of the equation <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/04/19/a-security-comparison-microsoft-office-vs-oracle-openoffice/">A Security Comparison: Microsoft Office vs. Oracle Openoffice</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there is not much to say about this. It is a blog post by CanegieMellon called <a href="http://www.cert.org/blogs/certcc/2011/04/office_shootout_microsoft_offi.html" target="_blank">A Security Comparison: Microsoft Office vs. Oracle Openoffice</a> and just does what it says. However, I do not particularly like the security comparison of products built solely on vulnerabilities as this shows only one side of the equation – an important one but only one.</p>
<p>For all the ones still claiming that Open Source software creates less vulnerabilities, here you find the some stats on Office:</p>
<p><img style="display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://www.cert.org/blogs/certcc/officefuzz-expmajor.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Interesting, hmm….</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/04/19/a-security-comparison-microsoft-office-vs-oracle-openoffice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Security Update Guide, Second Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/03/28/microsoft-security-update-guide-second-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/03/28/microsoft-security-update-guide-second-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patch Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/03/28/microsoft-security-update-guide-second-edition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A while ago we released the Microsoft Security Update Guide to explain how we release security updates and how you should/could work with our updates. It encompasses these themes:</p> Get to know the security update release process Learn how to evaluate risk See how to mitigate security risks Understand how quickly you need to apply <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/03/28/microsoft-security-update-guide-second-edition/">Microsoft Security Update Guide, Second Edition</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago we released the Microsoft Security Update Guide to explain how we release security updates and how you should/could work with our updates. It encompasses these themes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Get to know the security update release process</li>
<li>Learn how to evaluate risk</li>
<li>See how to mitigate security risks</li>
<li>Understand how quickly you need to apply updates</li>
<li>Assess your update</li>
<li>Get ongoing security</li>
</ul>
<p>If you are somehow linked to the security update process in your organization, you should download it and look at it here: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/msrc/whatwedo/securityguide.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Security Update Guide, Second Edition</a></p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/03/28/microsoft-security-update-guide-second-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide for Malware Response</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/20/infrastructure-planning-and-design-guide-for-malware-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/20/infrastructure-planning-and-design-guide-for-malware-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incident Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/20/infrastructure-planning-and-design-guide-for-malware-response/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new version of this guide went live – I think something, you should look at. There is a metrology and a process in detail:</p> <p></p> <p>So, if you want to learn more: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc162838.aspx</p> <p>Roger</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new version of this guide went live – I think something, you should look at. There is a metrology and a process in detail:</p>
<p><img style="margin: " src="http://i.technet.microsoft.com/Cc162838.image1(en-us,TechNet.10).jpg" /></p>
<p>So, if you want to learn more: <a title="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc162838.aspx" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc162838.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc162838.aspx</a></p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/20/infrastructure-planning-and-design-guide-for-malware-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting a Botnet</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/17/fighting-a-botnet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/17/fighting-a-botnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incident Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/17/fighting-a-botnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Malware Protection Center published a document on Battling the Zbot Threat, a special edition of the Security Intelligence Report. It is a very good document, worth looking at.</p> <p>This is the intro (to make you curious for more):</p> <p>This document provides an overview of the Win32/Zbot family of password-stealing trojans. The document examines the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/17/fighting-a-botnet/">Fighting a Botnet</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Malware Protection Center published a document on <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=da73febd-5a20-47d6-8a0b-789423e21a94" target="_blank">Battling the Zbot Threat</a>, a special edition of the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/sir/default.aspx" target="_blank">Security Intelligence Report</a>. It is a very good document, worth looking at.</p>
<p>This is the intro (to make you curious for more):</p>
<blockquote><p>This document provides an overview of the Win32/Zbot family of password-stealing trojans. The document examines the background of Win32/Zbot, its functionality, how it works, and provides telemetry data and analysis from calendar year 2010 about how this threat is detected and removed by Microsoft antimalware products and services.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/02/17/fighting-a-botnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Intelligence Report v9 is online</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2010/10/13/security-intelligence-report-v9-is-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2010/10/13/security-intelligence-report-v9-is-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Halbheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incident Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Intelligence Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.halbheer.info/security/2010/10/13/security-intelligence-report-v9-is-online</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Usually I blog intensively on the release of the Security Intelligence Report. However, this time I am out of office and have just little time to give you insight. We spent a lot of work to make it more comprehensive and give you a more stable view over quite some time. So there is a <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2010/10/13/security-intelligence-report-v9-is-online/">Security Intelligence Report v9 is online</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually I blog intensively on the release of the Security Intelligence Report. However, this time I am out of office and have just little time to give you insight. We spent a lot of work to make it more comprehensive and give you a more stable view over quite some time. So there is a great opportunity to see trends regarding different figures like the Malware Infection Rates.</p>
<p>Additionally we re-designed the website. This is the most comprehensive report in the industry, so you should look into it: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/sir/default.aspx" target="_blank">Security Intelligence Report</a></p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2010/10/13/security-intelligence-report-v9-is-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

