Should the Government be able to enforce security updates?

This is actually an interesting question. A lot of governments enforce rules and regulations on how you have to run your car, how often you have to check it, in which condition you have to keep your tires etc. The same is true for a lot of other devices we are using.

Now, it seems that the US just passed a bill to give the president the power to order companies to deploy security updates or block a certain type of traffic. I understand where this is coming from: You need some level of authority if your critical infrastructure is under attack. Here, a lot of governments rely on the collaboration of the different players. The US seems to go one step further. Honestly, I am not completely sure whether I like it or not. It has a lot of pros and cons.

What is your view?

Roger

Related posts:

  1. A Detailed Analysis of an Attack – Do We Need an International Incident Sharing Database?
  2. Legal Challenges of International Business and the Cloud
  3. Council of Europe – Octopus Conference (Cooperation against Cybercrime) – Key Messages
  4. Council of Europe – Octopus Conference (Cooperation against Cybercrime) Day 1
  5. Why it pays to be secure – Chapter 4 – I want to learn!

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Calendar

June 2010
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930