<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tired of Web 2.0? Kill your Online Identities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2010/01/07/tired-of-web-2-0-kill-your-online-identities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2010/01/07/tired-of-web-2-0-kill-your-online-identities/</link>
	<description>Information Security Discussion by Microsoft&#039;s Worldwide Chief Security Advisor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Discussion on Social Media &#171; Roger Halbheer on Security</title>
		<link>http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2010/01/07/tired-of-web-2-0-kill-your-online-identities/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Discussion on Social Media &#171; Roger Halbheer on Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/security/archive/2010/01/07/tired-of-web-2-0-kill-you-online-identities.aspx#comment-176</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently, we had an interesting discussion on Social Media. It actually all started with somebody sending a link around called http://pleaserobme.com/ to see who actually just said that they are not at home – information which can easily be gained through Twitter search. This lead then into a discussion where somebody claimed that, according to confused.com, heavy users of social media will have to pay higher home insurance in the future – shall we now delete all our social media life? Remember my post on Tired of Web 2.0? Kill your Online Identities? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently, we had an interesting discussion on Social Media. It actually all started with somebody sending a link around called <a href="http://pleaserobme.com/" rel="nofollow">http://pleaserobme.com/</a> to see who actually just said that they are not at home – information which can easily be gained through Twitter search. This lead then into a discussion where somebody claimed that, according to confused.com, heavy users of social media will have to pay higher home insurance in the future – shall we now delete all our social media life? Remember my post on Tired of Web 2.0? Kill your Online Identities? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

